Yoga for Chronic Low Back Pain
Helen Tilbrook, H. Cox, C. Hewitt, A. Kang’ombe, L. Chuang, Shalmini Jayakody, J. Aplin, Anna Semlyen, Alison Trewhela, I. Watt, D. Torgerson • 11/1/2011
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies indicate that yoga may be an effective treatment for chronic or recurrent low back pain. OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness of yoga and usual care for chronic or recurrent low back pain. DESIGN Parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial using computer-generated randomization conducted from April 2007 to March 2010. Outcomes were assessed by postal questionnaire. (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register: ISRCTN 81079604) SETTING 13 non-National Health Service premises in the United Kingdom. PATIENTS 313 adults with chronic or recurrent low back pain. INTERVENTION Yoga (n = 156) or usual care (n = 157). All participants received a back pain education booklet. The intervention group was offered a 12-class, gradually progressing yoga program delivered by 12 teachers over 3 months. MEASUREMENTS Scores on the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) at 3 (primary outcome), 6, and 12 (secondary outcomes) months; pain, pain self-efficacy, and general health measures at 3, 6, and 12 months (secondary outcomes). RESULTS 93 (60%) patients offered yoga attended at least 3 of the first 6 sessions and at least 3 other sessions. The yoga group had better back function at 3, 6, and 12 months than the usual care group. The adjusted mean RMDQ score was 2.17 points (95% CI, 1.03 to 3.31 points) lower in the yoga group at 3 months, 1.48 points (CI, 0.33 to 2.62 points) lower at 6 months, and 1.57 points (CI, 0.42 to 2.71 points) lower at 12 months. The yoga and usual care groups had similar back pain and general health scores at 3, 6, and 12 months, and the yoga group had higher pain self-efficacy scores at 3 and 6 months but not at 12 months. Two of the 157 usual care participants and 12 of the 156 yoga participants reported adverse events, mostly increased pain. LIMITATION There were missing data for the primary outcome (yoga group, n = 21; usual care group, n = 18) and differential missing data (more i...
Citations: 152